2017 Spring Budget: EU Rights and Claims
There does not appear to be any restrictions on EU law claims in today’s budget announcements. However the last two previous restrictions on EU claims were not announced with the budget but were only introduced very late at the final reporting stages of those bills, namely Part 8C CTA 2010 (the 45% super tax on interest payments by HMRC introduced in FA (2) 2015) and section 234 Finance Act 2013 (prohibition on interim payments against HMRC). There is one announcement that potentially infringes EU rights. A new 25% charge on pension transfers to qualifying recognised overseas pensions schemes has been introduced. This seems to involve a prima facie restriction on the EU right to free movement of capital. Although this does not apply where both the individual and the pension are located within the EEA, the right to free movement of capital applies outside the EEA as well. No similar charge would apply to transfers between UK registered pension funds.
Other announcements today include
Looking forward there will be:
The anticipated changes to partnership taxation – consulted on last year and where draft legislation was promised before this year – have not been announced today. Instead the government has said, again, that it will publish a response document (to last year’s consultation) and draft legislation.
- Before the summer recess HMRC will launch a consultation on how it risk profiles large businesses. The aim of the consultation will be to seek changes to the current process in order to promote stronger tax compliance;
- There will be legislation in FB2017 to amend the law on profits from trading in or developing land in the UK to ‘catch’ offshore developers;
- There will be legislation in FB2017 to remove the ability of businesses to turn losses from capital assets into allowable trading losses;
- There will be a Minimum Excise Tax on cigarettes.
- An increase in Class 4 National Insurance Contributions staged over years 2018 and 2019;
- A cut in the dividend allowance from April 2018.
This article appears in the JHA March 2017 Tax Newsletter, which also features:
- Prudential Assurance Company Ltd v HMRC: Supreme Court grants HMRC permission to appeal
- William Reeves v Revenue & Customs Commissioners: Holdover Relief – Definition of “Control”
Navigating Domicile Enquiries: Recent Case Review
In recent months, the First-tier Tax Tribunal has presided over 3 headline grabbing domicile cases which, whilst offering little precedential value, set out some useful commentary on the multi factorial approach taken by HMRC and ultimately the tribunal in determining an individual’s domicile status. This note reviews the decisions made in Shah v HMRC  UK FTT 539 (TC), Strachan v HMRC  UKFTT 00617 (TC) and Coller v HMRC  UKFTT 212 (TC).
Mini Umbrella Companies (“MUCs”) Success at Tribunal (Labour Supply; Kittel fraud; Fini fraud)
Iain MacWhannell, instructing David Bedenham, successfully represented an employment intermediary in an appeal against a denial of input tax and £15 million VAT assessment.
The End is Nigh for the Non-Dom Regime
Published in ThoughtLeaders4 Private Client Magazine, Helen McGhee expert analysis of the current state of non-dom tax regime and it's future.
HMRC Makes Changes to COP9
On 14 June 2023, HMRC published a substantially rewritten Code of Practice 9 (“COP9”). Helen McGhee and Megan Durnford set out the key changes implemented as a result of this publication.
Pandora Papers: HMRC issues nudge letters
The Pandora Papers leak of almost 12m documents back in 2021 purportedly exposed the secret accounts and dealings (including potential tax evasion/ avoidance and money laundering) of 35 world leaders (including the late HM Elizabeth II), as well as many politicians and billionaires. The data was obtained by the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists in Washington DC and led to one of the biggest ever global financial investigations.