AG Opinion: VAT Is Recoverable on Costs of Failed Ryanair/Aer Lingus Takeover
Advocate General (AG) Kokott has opined in C‑249/17 Ryanair Ltd v The Revenue Commissioners that input VAT incurred by Ryanair on costs in a failed takeover of Aer Lingus is deductible.
Ryanair made a bid to purchase a 100% shareholding of Aer Lingus in 2006. When the takeover failed, Ryanair tried to claim a deduction of input VAT paid on professional advisory fees incurred for the attempted takeover. The Irish revenue authority argued that Ryanair was not engaged in an economic activity in acquiring those professional services and refused Ryanair’s claim. The Irish Supreme Court asked the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) whether VAT on Ryanair’s costs could be deducted.
It is the AG’s opinion that input VAT should be fully deductible in the context of a strategic takeover by an operating undertaking. The AG held that failure to proceed with the acquisition did not impact the VAT recovery position. Applying a functional analysis, the AG concluded that the ‘acquisition of a company’s entire share capital with the intention of bringing about a direct, permanent and necessary extension of the taxable activity of the acquiring company constitutes an economic activity’.
The AG took the view that VAT recovery should be allowed even if the costs were sustained by a pure holding company, without an operating business, if such a holding company had the intention to provide (management) services to the target company after the takeover. In this respect, the AG argued that the only decisive factor was the ‘intention to commence an economic activity for VAT purposes, supported by objective evidence’.
As announced in July of last year, the 2020 Budget introduces a new deferred payment plan option for Corporation Tax charged on profits or gains arising from certain transactions between UK companies and EEA companies of the same group of companies.
Reversal of Inverclyde
The 2020 Budget announced provisions to reverse last year’s FTT decision in Inverclyde. In that case, HMRC denied the appellant LLPs’ claims for Business Property Renovation Allowance on the basis that the LLPs did not carry on a business with a view to a profit.
HMRC nudge letters
HMRC continues to fight the good fight in its quest to cut down on tax avoidance and have recently been issuing further “nudge” letters to taxpayers who may have an income source or assets producing gains overseas and consequently an undisclosed outstanding UK tax liability.
ExxonMobil: FTT Decision Released
The FTT decision in Esso Exploration and Production UK Limited and others v HMRC, which relates to pre-2006 claims for Cross Border Group Relief, has now been released.