FII and Dividend Tax Update
In the Prudential case (Portfolio Dividend Tax and Life Assurance) the High Court has now given permission to both parties to appeal to the Court of Appeal. HMRC’s permission however was restricted, so that it cannot appeal on the issues connected with its “change of position defence” or the nominal rates of tax to apply. The Claimants were granted permission to appeal on the issue of whether dividend income should be exempt as opposed to carrying an additional credit. The court has also ordered that the quantification of Prudential’s claim for sample years be undertaken so that remaining disputes relating to computation are identified.
In the FII Group Litigation yesterday the High Court refused permission for HMRC to run two new defences on the grounds that they had been raised too close to trial and would impose extreme evidential burdens on the Claimants. One of these defences was the contention that the recovery of unlawfully paid tax should be reduced by the hypothetical tax saving that would derive from the increased interest deductions available as a result of the payment of the unlawful tax. The second defence was that the Claimants would have to prove that their subsidiaries were “genuinely established” in the terms of the Cadbury Schweppes case. Although HMRC was refused the ability to introduce these defences into the FII case, they implied that they might well be raised beyond the context of the GLOs. The trial of the FII test cases is set for May.
This article appears in the JHA January 2014 Tax Newsletter, which also features:
- Tax Credit Claims Made Out Of Time by Alice McDonald
- Exit Taxes by Amita Chohan
- Unjust Enrichment Defence Compatible with Equal Treatment by Alice McDonald
You can download the complete newsletter as a PDF below:
Navigating Domicile Enquiries: Recent Case Review
In recent months, the First-tier Tax Tribunal has presided over 3 headline grabbing domicile cases which, whilst offering little precedential value, set out some useful commentary on the multi factorial approach taken by HMRC and ultimately the tribunal in determining an individual’s domicile status. This note reviews the decisions made in Shah v HMRC  UK FTT 539 (TC), Strachan v HMRC  UKFTT 00617 (TC) and Coller v HMRC  UKFTT 212 (TC).
Mini Umbrella Companies (“MUCs”) Success at Tribunal (Labour Supply; Kittel fraud; Fini fraud)
Iain MacWhannell, instructing David Bedenham, successfully represented an employment intermediary in an appeal against a denial of input tax and £15 million VAT assessment.
The End is Nigh for the Non-Dom Regime
Published in ThoughtLeaders4 Private Client Magazine, Helen McGhee expert analysis of the current state of non-dom tax regime and it's future.
HMRC Makes Changes to COP9
On 14 June 2023, HMRC published a substantially rewritten Code of Practice 9 (“COP9”). Helen McGhee and Megan Durnford set out the key changes implemented as a result of this publication.
Pandora Papers: HMRC issues nudge letters
The Pandora Papers leak of almost 12m documents back in 2021 purportedly exposed the secret accounts and dealings (including potential tax evasion/ avoidance and money laundering) of 35 world leaders (including the late HM Elizabeth II), as well as many politicians and billionaires. The data was obtained by the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists in Washington DC and led to one of the biggest ever global financial investigations.