German Ministry of Finance Guidance on Anti-Treaty Shopping Rule
The German Ministry of Finance has published its official guidance on the German anti-treaty shopping rule, in direct response to the decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union (‘CJEU’) in Joined Cases C-504/16 and C-613/16 Deister Holding and Juhler Holding (reported in the January 2018 newsletter). The CJEU had held that the German anti-treaty shopping provisions breached the Parent-Subsidiary Directive (‘PSD’).
Issued on 4 April 2018, the guidance provides that the previous German laws on anti-treaty shopping (dated 2007) are no longer to be applied in open cases where the foreign recipient of a distribution of profits claims a tax refund under the PSD, so that all such open cases must now be approved by the Federal Central Tax Office. Significantly, the guidance also comments on the applicability of the subsequent (2012) anti-treaty shopping provision. The guidance stipulates that the 2012 provision allows holding entities that only carry out asset management to claim tax relief under the PSD, provided that the said entity actually exercises its shareholder rights and does not merely exist for the purpose of avoiding tax.
It is worth noting that the guidance only concerns dividend withholding tax under the PSD. Specifically, the guidance does not affect withholding tax relief on interest or royalties (under the Interest and Royalties Directive) or relief on other dividends not falling within the scope of the PSD.
This article appears in the JHA April 2018 Tax Newsletter, which also features:
- Slovak Emission Allowances Tax Breaches EU Law
- HMRC May Not Open Enquiry into Voluntary Self-Assessment Return
A yellow card for footballers and their agents……let’s bring in another match official
There has been long running tension between HMRC and the way that footballers and their agents are remunerated. As the Professional Footballers’ Association wade into the debate, Helen McGhee discusses the problems arising from agents’ fees and image rights.
Keeping Your Confidences
Helen McGhee considers the legal rights which allow individuals and companies to resist the disclosure of confidential evidence, and the limitations surrounding legal privilege.
The new powers tackling promoters of avoidance schemes
Under new proposals in draft Finance Bill 2021, HMRC will have wider information powers and be able to impose tougher sanctions on those who continue to promote or enable tax avoidance schemes. Whilst a robust approach to tackle unacceptable behaviour by a minority of promoters is entirely welcome, the new rules would arguably impose unnecessary administrative burdens on those operating within the law.
Draft Finance Bill 2020–21—promoters and enablers of tax avoidance schemes
Helen McGhee, senior associate at Joseph Hage Aaronson LLP, shares her insights on the Draft Finance Bill 2020–21 and its impact on promoters and enablers of tax avoidance schemes.
Apple and Ireland Win €13bn State Aid Appeal
The General Court of the European Union has today annulled the Commission’s decision regarding two Irish tax rulings in favour of Apple. The Commission had considered that the two rulings constituted State Aid, granting Apple €13bn in unlawful tax advantages.