HMRC launches first Criminal Investigations under the new ‘Failure to Prevent’ Offence

24 May 2019
Author: JHA

A recent freedom of information request has revealed that HMRC is currently investigating several cases under the corporate criminal offence of failure to prevent the facilitation of UK tax evasion.

This corporate criminal offence, which was introduced in the Criminal Finances Act (CFA) 2017, places a positive obligation on companies to implement procedures to prevent the facilitation of UK tax evasion. While this offence applies to all companies, it is particularly aimed at banks, accountants and law firms, who are often regarded as unwitting ‘enablers’ of this type of crime.
Under section 45(1) of the CFA a company ‘is guilty of an offence if a person commits a UK tax evasion facilitation offence when acting in the capacity of a person associated with (the company)’. A company can defend itself if it can show the tax evasion facilitation offence was committed despite the company having had in place such prevention procedures as it was reasonable in all the circumstances to expect the company to have in place; or it was not reasonable in all the circumstances to expect the company to have any prevention procedures in place. The ‘failure to prevent’ offence can be punished by unlimited fines and orders for confiscation of assets.

The criminal investigations reported by HMRC show that some action is now being taken regarding prosecuting companies for financial crime, something the UK has been comparatively ineffective at in the past and is under increasing pressure to step up, as shown in the recent report by the Treasury Committee on anti-money laundering and anti-financial crime regime in the UK. The launching of these investigations by HMRC potentially marks a first step in the direction of pursuing effective prosecutions in this area and shaping the landscape of corporate liability in the UK in general.

It is not known how long these cases will take to investigate and it is likely that it will be many more months until we see the first prosecution in the UK for this offence. However, it is likely that the number of investigations brought under this legislation will increase over the next few years and companies should be prepared.

Return to List of Articles by UK Lawyers on Tax Disputes, Tax Litigation, HMRC Tax Appeal Return to Listings
Left Button on Tax Dispute & Tax Litigation Lawyers in London

Our Insights

Insights from UK Tax Dispute Lawyers & HMRC Tax litigation

JHA ranked in top tier again in Legal 500 UK 2025

We are happy to announce that JHA's Tax Disputes Team has again been ranked as Tier 1 by Legal 500 today, a ranking we have proudly achieved every year since we began in 2013. A special congratulations to Graham Aaronson KC who has again been recognised in the Hall of Fame category, Iain MacWhannell (ranked as a Leading Partner) and Mei Wong (ranked as a Leading Associate).

This is the latest successful ranking, following previous top-tier rankings in Chambers UK Legal Guide 2024 and Chambers High Net Worth Guide 2024.

Read More
Insights from UK Tax Dispute Lawyers & HMRC Tax litigation

Armour Veterinary Group v HMRC – Warning for Partnership Personnel Changes?

In this decision, the First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) (“FTT”) dismissed an appeal against discovery assessments which disallowed amortisation relief claimed by the Appellant company for three types of goodwill acquired from a partnership. The decision examined the applicability of each of the circumstances set out in s882 CTA 2009 before concluding none of them had been satisfied. It also provided guidance on the meaning of carrying on a business pursuant to s884 CTA 2009. In rejecting the appeal, the FTT reached a number of key conclusions:

  1. partners can potentially rebut the presumption that individual partners do not own the goodwill of the business (in whole or part) by expressly recording the division in a partnership agreement;
  2. whether a partner is an equity or salaried partner has no bearing on whether they can be treated as carrying on the business for the purpose of s884;
  3. when determining whether and when a partner carries on a business, the FTT will consider, inter alia, (1) if they are in a partnership as per the definition in s1 of the Partnership Act 1890 and (2) their role in the day-to-day running of the practice;
  4. a fundamental aspect of the self-assessment regime is that taxpayers must ensure that they retain adequate records (backed up by an external valuation as relevant in the case of a goodwill transfer) sufficient to support the information provided in their returns, including evidence to support claims made for relief.

Read More

Right Button on Tax Dispute & Tax Litigation Lawyers in London