ROSIIP GLO: Taxpayers succeed
The ROSIIP GLO concerned the imposition of a 55% tax charges against pension-holders who had transferred their UK pensions into the Singapore ROSIIP Pension Fund. At the time of transfer, ROSIIP had been listed on HMRC’s website as a QROPS – transfers to which attract no charge to tax. The fund was retrospectively withdrawn from HMRC’s list in 2008 so that transfers made prior to its withdrawn were said to be “unauthorised payments” and were assessed to the 55% charges.
The pension holders argued that HMRC could not impose the tax charges against them because they had obtained a legitimate expectation from HMRC that they would not be subject to tax on their transfers. On the fifth day of the hearing, HMRC accepted that they could not maintain their assessments against the claimants and the assessments were withdrawn. The background to the withdrawal of these assessments suggests that HMRC may not be able to impose tax charges against individuals who make transfers into other funds which appeared on the QROPS list and were later removed retrospectively.
If you or your clients receive an assessment or enquiry in circumstances similar to those described above, please contact us.
This article appears in the JHA July 2013 Tax Newsletter, which also features:
- Retrospective Changes to rules on interim payment applications in tax cases
- FII GLO 3rd ECJ reference
- Portfolio Dividend Claims: High Court Trial Concludes
- Exit Taxes
- Belgium notional interest deduction regime contrary to EU law
Navigating Domicile Enquiries: Recent Case Review
In recent months, the First-tier Tax Tribunal has presided over 3 headline grabbing domicile cases which, whilst offering little precedential value, set out some useful commentary on the multi factorial approach taken by HMRC and ultimately the tribunal in determining an individual’s domicile status. This note reviews the decisions made in Shah v HMRC  UK FTT 539 (TC), Strachan v HMRC  UKFTT 00617 (TC) and Coller v HMRC  UKFTT 212 (TC).
Mini Umbrella Companies (“MUCs”) Success at Tribunal (Labour Supply; Kittel fraud; Fini fraud)
Iain MacWhannell, instructing David Bedenham, successfully represented an employment intermediary in an appeal against a denial of input tax and £15 million VAT assessment.
The End is Nigh for the Non-Dom Regime
Published in ThoughtLeaders4 Private Client Magazine, Helen McGhee expert analysis of the current state of non-dom tax regime and it's future.
HMRC Makes Changes to COP9
On 14 June 2023, HMRC published a substantially rewritten Code of Practice 9 (“COP9”). Helen McGhee and Megan Durnford set out the key changes implemented as a result of this publication.
Pandora Papers: HMRC issues nudge letters
The Pandora Papers leak of almost 12m documents back in 2021 purportedly exposed the secret accounts and dealings (including potential tax evasion/ avoidance and money laundering) of 35 world leaders (including the late HM Elizabeth II), as well as many politicians and billionaires. The data was obtained by the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists in Washington DC and led to one of the biggest ever global financial investigations.