Slovak Emission Allowances Tax Breaches EU Law
The CJEU has held in C-302/17 PPC Power that the Slovak tax on sold or unused greenhouse gas emission allowances is not compatible with EU law as it is contrary to the principle of the free allocation of allowances.
During 2011-2012 Slovakia levied a tax of 80% on allowances that were sold or were not used by entities participating in the EU Emission Trading System (‘EU ETS’). The allowances had been allocated to those entities free of charge in accordance with Directive 2003/87/EC (the ‘EU ETS Directive’).
The CJEU held that the free allocation of allowances was intended to prevent EU ETS regulated entities from losing competitiveness as a result of the introduction of the EU ETS. The economic value of allowances underpins the EU ETS, as selling unused allowances encourages undertakings to invest in emission reducing measures. However, depriving these undertakings of 80% of the value of such allowances removes most of the economic incentive to invest in measures to reduce emissions. In conclusion, the tax has the effect of neutralising the free allocation of allowances and is therefore incompatible with the EU ETS Directive.
This article appears in the JHA April 2018 Tax Newsletter, which also features:
- German Ministry of Finance Guidance on Anti-Treaty Shopping Rule
- HMRC May Not Open Enquiry into Voluntary Self-Assessment Return
The DBKAG & K (CJEU) decision: an opportunity for investment funds?
On 17 June 2021, the European Court decided the joint cases K (C-58/20) and DBKAG (C-59/20) regarding whether the supply of certain services constituted the “management of special investment funds”, benefiting from the VAT exemption enshrined in Article 135(1)(g) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC.
Raising the bar: UK Supreme Court clarifies the requirements for HMRC to issue Follower Notices
On 2 July 2021, the Supreme Court delivered its judgment in R (on the application of Haworth) v HMRC  UKSC 25, finding unanimously in favour of the taxpayer and upholding the Court of Appeal’s decision to quash the follower notice issued to him.
The Danish Supreme Court decides the Fidelity case
The Fidelity case concerned claims brough by three undertakings for collective investment in transferable securities (UCITS) for the repayment of Danish withholding tax on dividends received from companies resident in Denmark between 2000 and 2009. The Supreme Court rejected the claims on the grounds that the Fidelity UCITS did not fulfil the conditions for the exemption provided by Danish law.
A yellow card for footballers and their agents……let’s bring in another match official
There has been long running tension between HMRC and the way that footballers and their agents are remunerated. As the Professional Footballers’ Association wade into the debate, Helen McGhee discusses the problems arising from agents’ fees and image rights.