HMRC Makes Changes to COP9

26 June 2023

On 14 June 2023, HMRC published a substantially rewritten Code of Practice 9 (“COP9”). Set out below are the key changes implemented as a result of this publication.

What is COP9?

COP9 is a process whereby a person whom HMRC suspects is guilty of tax fraud is given the opportunity to make a disclosure setting out the background/reasons for any non-compliance and make good any potentially unpaid tax. In exchange, subject to the exceptions listed under “Key Change 2” below, HMRC will formally agree not to open a criminal investigation. This agreement is called the Contractual Disclosure Facility or “CDF”.

Key Change 1 – Broadening the Definition of Tax Fraud

Previously, tax fraud was defined as “dishonest behaviour that led to or was intended to lead to a loss of tax”. Under the new COP9 however, this has been extended to “dishonest behaviour that led to or was intended to lead to a risk of loss of tax”. It further confirms that an individual will still fall within this definition even if the fraud is in respect of tax owed by another, even if the individual does not personally make any gain.

Key Change 2 – New Guidance on Circumstances When HMRC Can Escalate to Criminal Investigation

Pursuant to the new COP9, HMRC may still conduct a criminal investigation under the following circumstances:

  1. Deemed rejection: if a response to the CDF offer is not received by HMRC within 60 days;
  2. Rejection: the taxpayer expressly rejects the offer;
  3. No Outline Disclosure (as defined in COP9) is provided with the standard Acceptance Letter;
  4. Incomplete Outline Disclosure: if HMRC suspect an individual of further tax fraud not disclosed, they can still conduct a criminal investigation into such fraud. Any fraud disclosed in the Outline Disclosure may still be exempt from any subsequent criminal investigation;
  5. False statement or false documents submitted;
  6. Incorrect or incomplete Formal Disclosure documents;
  7. Withdrawing the admission of deliberate behaviour: HMRC will still consider any explanation offered as to the reason for a renewed position as regards behaviour but such a change in approach will (in the absence of a good reason) be considered a repudiation of the CDF. Any material disclosed prior to the repudiation of the CDF may be used as evidence in any subsequent criminal investigation.

Key Change 3 – Personal Attendance at Meetings

The new COP9 guidance emphasises the importance HMRC now places on the individual attending meetings, stating “we view your attendance and your cooperation at meetings if we ask you to attend them as a strong indication of your engagement with the investigation.” Whilst an advisor may accompany the individual, under the updated COP9 procedure, it is clear that personal attendance by the individual is expected.

Key Change 4 – Payment to HMRC

Included within the new terms of the CDF is an expectation that the individual will make a payment on account of any arrears of tax or duty. This obligation arises at the stage of making the Outline Disclosure but there is also an expectation that the individual will make payments on account throughout the investigation as well as upon completion of the Formal Disclosure.

For further advice on COP9, please contact Helen McGhee

Return to List of Articles by UK Lawyers on Tax Disputes, Tax Litigation, HMRC Tax Appeal Return to Listings
Left Button on Tax Dispute & Tax Litigation Lawyers in London

Our Insights

Insights from UK Tax Dispute Lawyers & HMRC Tax litigation

The End is Nigh for the Non-Dom Regime

Published in ThoughtLeaders4 Private Client Magazine, Helen McGhee expert analysis of the current state of non-dom tax regime and it's future.

Read More
Insights from UK Tax Dispute Lawyers & HMRC Tax litigation

Increased Investment in Personal Tax Compliance in the UK (Published in Thought Leaders 4 Private Client)

Advances in technology and increased international fiscal co-operation have made global personal tax compliance initiatives pop up in abundance in recent years. To compound the issue, the Russian invasion of Ukraine and the corresponding economic fallout prompted domestic governments to increase transparency in relation to investments held by wealthy foreign individuals (with a focus on oligarchs).

In the UK, in the context of the cost-of-living crisis, public opinion certainly seems to be in favour of increased accountability for high-net-worth individuals (eg, on 9 October 2022, 63% of Britons surveyed thought that “the rich are not paying enough and their taxes should be increased”).1

HMRC is one of the most sophisticated tax collection authorities in the world and the department is making significant investments in technology in the field of compliance work; they are well placed to take advantage of new international efforts to increase tax compliance, particularly considering the already extensive network of 130 bilateral tax treaties in the UK (the largest in the world).2 The UK was also a founding member of the OECD’s Joint International Taskforce on Shared Intelligence and Collaboration (JITSIC) forum.

This article discusses the main developments in support of the increased focus on international transparency and personal tax compliance in the UK. There are other international fiscal initiatives, particularly in the field of corporate taxation, but such initiatives are beyond the scope of this article.

It should be noted that a somewhat piecemeal approach, with constant tinkering makes compliance difficult for the taxpayer and is often criticised for lacking the certainty that a stable tax system needs to thrive.

This article was first published with ThoughtLeaders4 Private Client Magazine

Read More

Right Button on Tax Dispute & Tax Litigation Lawyers in London